Affiliation:
1. Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Botnar
Research Centre, Headington, Oxford
OX3 7LD, UK.
Abstract
There is a North Atlantic divide, with cementless femoral stems being used more frequently in the USA and cemented stems being used more frequently in many countries in Europe. This is primarily because different cemented stems have been used on different sides of the Atlantic and the results of the cemented stems in the US have often been poor, whereas the results of the stems used in Europe have been good. In the National registers in Europe, cemented stems have tended to achieve better results than cementless. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B, Supple A:51–2.
Publisher
British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Reference15 articles.
1. Garellick G, Karrholm J, Rogmark C, Rolfson O, Herberts P. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Annual Report 2011. http://www.shpr.se/Files/%C3%85rsrapport% 202011 %20%28eng%29%20webb.pdf (date last accessed 19 September 2013).
2. No authors listed. National Joint Registry for England and Wales 9th Annual Report, http://www.njrcentre.org.uk (date last accessed 15 August 2013).
3. Survivorship of a Charnley Total Hip Arthroplasty
4. The Long-Term Results of the Original Exeter Polished Cemented Femoral Component
5. Ten-year RSA-measured migration of the Exeter femoral stem
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献