The trainer, the trainee and the surgeons’ assistant

Author:

Palan J.1,Gulati A.1,Andrew J. G.2,Murray D. W.1,Beard D. J.1

Affiliation:

1. Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.

2. Ysbyty, Gwynedd, Penrhosgarnedd, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2PW, UK.

Abstract

Balancing service provision and surgical training is a challenging issue that affects all healthcare systems. A multicentre prospective study of 1501 total hip replacements was undertaken to investigate whether there is an association between surgical outcome and the grade of the operating surgeon, and whether there is any difference in outcome if surgeons’ assistants assist with the operation, rather than orthopaedic trainees. The primary outcome measure was the change in the Oxford hip score (OHS) at five years. Secondary outcomes included the rate of revision and dislocation, operating time, and length of hospital stay. There was no significant difference in ΔOHS or complication rates between operations undertaken by trainers and trainees, or those at which surgeons’ assistants and trainees were the assistant. However, there was a significant difference in the duration of surgery, with a mean reduction of 28 minutes in those in which a surgeons’ assistant was the assistant. This study provides evidence that total hip replacements can be performed safely and effectively by appropriately trained surgeons in training, and that there are potential benefits of using surgeons’ assistants in orthopaedic surgery.

Publisher

British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Reference39 articles.

1. No authors listed. Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). Main operations: 4 character table 2004/55. Department of Health, 2005. www.hesonline.nhs.uk (date last accessed 20 May 2009).

2. Population requirement for primary hip-replacement surgery: a cross-sectional study

3. Gray A. Population ageing and health care expenditure. Ageing Horizons 2005;2:15–20.

4. Britain's National Health Service Revisited

5. No time to train the surgeons

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3