Missing data may lead to changes in hip fracture database studies

Author:

Basques B. A.1,McLynn R. P.1,Lukasiewicz A. M.2,Samuel A. M.3,Bohl D. D.4,Grauer J. N.1

Affiliation:

1. Yale School of Medicine, 47 College Street, 2nd Floor, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA.

2. Yale School of Medicine

3. Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, New York 10021, USA.

4. Rush University Medical Center, 1611 West Harrison Street, Suite 300, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.

Abstract

Aims The aims of this study were to characterize the frequency of missing data in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database and to determine how missing data can influence the results of studies dealing with elderly patients with a fracture of the hip. Patients and Methods Patients who underwent surgery for a fracture of the hip between 2005 and 2013 were identified from the NSQIP database and the percentage of missing data was noted for demographics, comorbidities and laboratory values. These variables were tested for association with ‘any adverse event’ using multivariate regressions based on common ways of handling missing data. Results A total of 26 066 patients were identified. The rate of missing data was up to 77.9% for many variables. Multivariate regressions comparing three methods of handling missing data found different risk factors for postoperative adverse events. Only seven of 35 identified risk factors (20%) were common to all three analyses. Conclusion Missing data is an important issue in national database studies that researchers must consider when evaluating such investigations. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:226–32.

Publisher

British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Reference36 articles.

1. Nationwide Inpatient Sample and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Give Different Results in Hip Fracture Studies

2. The myths of ‘big data’ in health care

3. No authors listed. User Guide for the 2015 ACS NSQIP Participant Use Data File (PUF). American College of Surgeons. 2016.https://www.facs.org/~/media/files/quality%20programs/nsqip/nsqip_puf_user_guide_2015.ashx (date last accessed 27 October 2017).

4. General versus spinal anaesthesia for patients aged 70 years and older with a fracture of the hip

5. Extramedullary Compared with Intramedullary Implants for Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3