HIP ASSESSMENT: A COMPARISON OF NINE DIFFERENT METHODS-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

HIP ASSESSMENT: A COMPARISON OF NINE DIFFERENT METHODS

Published:1972-11 Issue:4 Volume:54-B Page:621-625
ISSN:0301-620X
Container-title:The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
language:en
Short-container-title:The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume

Author:

Andersson Gunnar¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery II, University of Göteborg, Sweden

Abstract

1. The various methods of assessing the results of hip arthroplasties have been investigated. 2. The different results obtained by using different methods are very significant. 3. The importance of achieving a generally agreed assessment is obvious.

Publisher

British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Link

https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/pdf/10.1302/0301-620X.54B4.621

Cited by 69 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The outcomes of total hip replacement in osteonecrosis versus osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis;International Orthopaedics;2023-03-11

2. Reliability and Validity of Upper Extremity Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Assessing Traumatic Finger Amputation Management;Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery;2020-01

3. Understanding outcomes and toxicological aspects of second generation metal-on-metal hip implants: a state-of-the-art review;Critical Reviews in Toxicology;2018-11-26

4. Functional Results of Hip Arthroplasty with Acrylic Prosthesis;Classic Papers in Orthopaedics;2013-12-07

5. Patients with osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis have better functional outcomes and those with avascular necrosis worse pain outcomes compared to rheumatoid arthritis after primary hip arthroplasty: a cohort study;BMC Medicine;2013-09-24