Author:
. Meenakshi,Sanchez Domenic T.,Peconcillo, Jr. Larry B.,Vera John V. De,Mahajan Dr. Rupali,Kumar Dr. Tribhuwan,Bhosle Dr. Amol A
Abstract
The process of teaching and learning is the most powerful tool that teachers and professors have, because it is the main way that students change in the ways that teachers and professors want them to. TQM is recommended as a way to control, monitor, and improve the quality of teaching and learning strategies in the classroom. In line with the principles of TQM, evaluations of things like results and feedback are used to improve teaching and learning. The level of academic success that a program's students have may say a lot about how good that programme is. You can predict how well a student will do in school in the future by looking at how well they did in the past. After more research, it might be possible to find a link between the students' grades and their skills and interests. When teachers have this kind of information, they are better able to focus on the students who are having the most trouble. This article shows how to use feature selection and machine learning to improve the quality of teaching and learning in higher education by predicting how well a student will do in school. The performance of university students is used as an input to a classification model. First, ant colony optimization is used to choose the most important features. Then, KNN, Naive Bayes, and decision tree algorithms are used to classify the chosen data. Based on accuracy, recall, and F1 score, KNN performs better.
Publisher
Perpetual Innovation Media Pvt. Ltd.
Reference23 articles.
1. N. Tomasevic, N. Gvozdenovic, and S. Vranes, ‘‘An overview and comparison of supervised data mining techniques for student exam performance prediction,’’ Comput. Educ., vol. 143, Jan. 2020, Art. no. 103676.
2. Veluri et al., "Learning analytics using deep learning techniques for efficiently managing educational institutes", Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 51, pp. 2317-2320, 2022. Available: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.416
3. F. Yang and F. W. B. Li, ‘‘Study on student performance estimation, student progress analysis, and student potential prediction based on data mining,’’ Comput. Educ., vol. 123, pp. 97–108, Aug. 2018.
4. Raghuvanshi, A., Singh, U., Sajja, G., Pallathadka, H., Asenso, E., & Kamal, M. et al. (2022). Intrusion Detection Using Machine Learning for Risk Mitigation in IoT-Enabled Smart Irrigation in Smart Farming. Journal of Food Quality, 2022, 1-8. doi: 10.1155/2022/3955514
5. B.-H. Kim, E. Vizitei, and V. Ganapathi, ‘‘GritNet: Student performance prediction with deep learning,’’ 2018, arXiv:1804.07405. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.07405