A magyarországi 10–11. századi sebészi trepanációk összehasonlító vizsgálata a validált oszteoarcheológiai adatok tükrében

Author:

Király Kitty

Abstract

Trepanations are divided into three groups in the Eastern European osteological practice: surgical, cultical and symbolic trepanations. Classical surgical interventions are conducted on living subjects, and all three layers of the cranial vault are removed. My examinations were conducted in skeletal series with skulls bearing surgical trepanations that derive from the Conquest Period and the early Árpádian Age (9–11th c. CE). I examined all cases applying a unified protocol for comparability, and I also made efforts to verify the dating and the trepanation diagnosis of each possible case. This type of work creating a cadastre of 10–11th century trepanations is unprecedented in the Hungarian osteological practice. In 51 cases, the earlier diagnosis of trepanation was verified. I examined all the available remains of each affected individuals, and also investigated 5 more individuals of the same sex and similar age-at-death in each series for comparison. Instead of the usual nosology-based palaeopathological diagnostical process, I observed types of lesion in the endocranial and ectocranial surfaces, and made statistical comparison between the trepanned and non-trepanned samples. The work hypothesis was that trepanations were conducted for real therapeutic reasons. If pathological features are more frequent among individuals with trepanations than their peers, it indirectly implies that trepanation might have been applied as a therapeutic measure in most cases and was not a ritual intervention as often hypothesized elsewhere. Beside the comparative work, we also put forward a change in nomenclature; we wish to introduce the word ‘cranioglyph’ instead of ‘symbolic trepanation’, since the latter tends to be confused with other interventions in the Western practice. In the future, we wish to carry on the comparative approach to postcranial elements and activity-related changes to further elucidate the indication of these ancient surgical techniques.

Publisher

Anthropologiai Kozlemenyek

Subject

General Medicine

Reference63 articles.

1. Anda, T. (1951): Recherches archeologiques sur la pratique medicale des hongrois a l’epoque de la Conquete de pays. Acta Archaeologica Hungarica, 1: 251–316.

2. Arnott, R., Finger, S., Smith, C. (2003, Eds): Trepanation: History, Discovery, Theory. Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse. pp. 408.

3. Aufderheide, A.C., Rodríguez-Martín, C. (1998): The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Paleopathology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 478.

4. Bartucz, L. (1950): Adatok a koponylékelés (trepanáció) és a bregmasebek kapcsolatának problémájához magyarországi népvándorláskori koponyák alapján. A szegedi Tudományegyetem Biológiai Intézetének Évkönyve, 1: 389–435.

5. Bartucz, L. (1966): A praehistorikus trepanáció és orvostörténeti vonatkozású sírleletek. Palaeopathologia III. Országos Orvostörténeti Könyvtár, Budapest. pp. 610.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3