Affiliation:
1. The University of Georgia
2. International Food Policy Research Institute
3. University of Florida
Abstract
Professionalization is a critical component of organizational capacity and productivity. Yet, rural advisory service (RAS) providers who are charged with disseminating research-driven techniques and ideas that enhance agricultural production and addressing local stakeholder needs are often overlooked in this area. One of the critical disconnects is the lack of consistent capacities for RAS networks to effectively support the professionalization of RAS providers. Based on a framework analyzing the typical milestones associated with professionalization efforts, capacity building, and social capital the study provides insights into the support mechanism needed for professionalization. Specifically, a Delphi a panel of 31 experts from 24 countries arrived at consensus on 33 specific capacities a RAS network may need to effectively support the professionalization of RAS providers. The results of the research provide a practical framework for RAS networks to consider from a professionalization and capacity building perspective. Keywords: professionalization, delphi, evaluation, capacity assessment, extension, network
Publisher
Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science,Education
Reference68 articles.
1. Abbott, A. (1991). The order of professionalization: An empirical analysis. Work and occupations, 18(4), 355-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888491018004001
2. Allan, J., Ozga, J., & Smyth, G. (2009). Social capital, professionalism and diversity. Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
3. Applemen, L. I. (2004). The rise of the modern American law school: How professionalization, German scholarship, and legal reform shaped our system of legal education. New England Law Review, 39, 274-283.
4. Benin, S., Nkonya, E., Okecho, G., Randriamamonjy, J., Kato, E., Lubade, G., & Kyotalimye, M. (2011). Returns to spending on agricultural extension: the case of the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) program of Uganda. Agricultural Economics, 42(2), 249-267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15740862.2010.00512.x
5. Bodin, Ö., & Crona, B. I. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 366- 374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献