A Comparative Analysis of High and Low Performing Schools in Agriculture in Eswatini

Author:

Tsikati Alfred1,Motsa Sanele2

Affiliation:

1. University of Eswatini, Swaziland

2. Mhlatane High School

Abstract

Analysis of the school performance in external Agriculture examination showed that there were schools that consistently performed well and those constantly performing poorly in Eswatini. Unfortunately, there is no study that has sought to analyze the characteristics of the high performing and low performing schools in agriculture in Eswatini. Thus, the purpose of the study was to analyze the high and low performing schools in Agriculture in Eswatini. A comparative analysis targeting 27 schools: 15 high performing and 12 low performing schools was conducted. All the 38 teachers and 26 teachers from high and low performing schools respectively, participated in this study. A questionnaire was used in data collection. Three experts from the Department of Agricultural Education and Extension at University of Eswatini and two agriculture teachers validated the questionnaire. Thirty agriculture teachers who were not involved in the study were used in pilot testing to establish inter-item reliability using Cronbach’s Alpha and the reliability coefficient was .82. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Findings revealed that high performing schools possessed the following features over low performing schools: motivation of learners to excel in academic work, practice farming in school garden, student making consultations with teachers, provision of extra lessons for students, monitoring class attendance and absenteeism, and teachers attending classes regularly. Also, the Ministry of Education and Training, headteachers, agriculture teachers and parents were more involved in high performing schools than in low performing schools. Therefore, the study recommended that special attention should be made to assist all stakeholders in low performing schools improve the academic performance. Keywords: academic performance; agriculture; comparative analysis; low performing school; high performing school

Publisher

Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education

Subject

Agronomy and Crop Science,Education

Reference32 articles.

1. Anonymous. (2015). Characteristics of high-achieving and low-achieving schools in Science and Mathematics. Retrieved from https://www.everettsd.org

2. Archbald, D. (1996). Measuring school choice using indicators. Educational Policy, 10(1), 88-108. Bell, M., & Cordingley, P. (2014). Characteristics of high performing schools. Centre for the Use of Research and Evidence in Education, 1-26.

3. Brawner, D., Stephens, C. A., Stripling, C. T., & Eash, N. S. (2016). Impact of teachers on an Australian community over ten years: A qualitative study. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 23(1). doi:10.5191/jiaee.2016.23105 Burby, R. (2003). Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 19(1), 33-50.

4. Burke, D. J., & Hara, S. R. (2008). Parent involvement: The key to improved student achievement. School Community Journal, 8(2), 23-34.

5. Ceylan, E., & Akerson, V. (2014). Comparing the low and highperforming schools based on the TIMSS in the United States. Education and Science, 39(173), 299–309.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3