Investigation of an Alternatively Certified New High School Chemistry Teacher’s Assessment Literacy

Author:

Izci Kemal,Siegel Marcelle A.

Publisher

ISTES Organization

Subject

Education,Mathematics (miscellaneous)

Reference2 articles.

1. Abell, S. K., & Siegel,M. A. (2011). Assessment literacy: What science teachers need to know and be able to do? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The professional knowledge base of science teaching (pp. 205–221). The Netherlands: Springer. Akerson, V., Carter, I., Park Rogers, M., Pongsanon, K. (2018). A video-based measure of preservice teachers’ abilities to predict elementary students’ scientific reasoning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 6 (1), 79-92. Ateh, C. M. (2015). Science teachers' elicitation practices: insights for formative assessment. Educational Assessment, 20(2), 112-131. Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers’ ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45(1), 83-93. Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. M., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.

2. Baptiste, I. (2001). Qualitative data analysis: Common phases, strategic differences. Retrieved January 29, 2018, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqstexte/3-01/3-01baptiste-e.htm Barendsen, E. & Henze, I. (2017). Relating teacher PCK and teacher practice using classroom observation. Res Sci Educ, doi.10.1007/s11165-017-9637-z Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: a critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5 – 25 Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Eds.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81-100). London: Sage. Box, C., Skoog, G., & Dabbs, J. M. (2015). A case study of teacher personal practice assessment theories and complexities of implementing formative assessment. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 956–983. Brown, G. T. L. (2008). Conceptions of assessment: Understanding what assessment means to teachers and students. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chen, B., & Wei, B. (2015). Examining chemistry teachers’ use of curriculum materials: In view of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 260–272. Cisterna, D. & Gotwals, A. (2018) Enactment of ongoing formative assessment: Challenges and opportunities for professional development and practice, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(3), 200-222, DOI: 10.1080/1046560X.2018.1432227 Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109-1136. Fletcher, A. & Shaw G. (2012). How does student-directed assessment affect learning? Using assessment as a learning process. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 6, 245-263. Gottheiner, D. G., & Siegel, M. A. (2012). Experienced middle school science teachers’ assessment literacy: Investigating knowledge of students’ conceptions in genetics and ways to shape instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 531–557. Gotwals, A. W., & Birmingham, D. (2016). Eliciting, identifying, interpreting, and responding to students’ ideas: Teacher candidates’ growth in formative assessment practices. Research in Science Education, 46(1), 365–388. Harshman J. and Yezierski E. (2017). Assessment data-driven inquiry: A review of how to use assessment results to inform chemistry teaching, Science Educator, 25 (2), p. 97-107. Harshman, J. and Yezierski, E. (2016). Characterizing high school chemistry teachers’ use of assessment data via latent class analysis, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 17(2), 296–308. Harshman, J., & Yezierski, E. (2015). Guiding teaching with assessments: High school chemistry teachers’ use of data-driven inquiry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 16(1), 93-103. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81–112. Haug, B. S., & Ødegaard, M. (2015). Formative assessment and teachers' sensitivity to student responses. International Journal of Science Education, 37(4), 629-654. Herman, J., Osmundson, E., Dai, Y., Ringstaff, C., & Timms, M. (2015). Investigating the dynamics of formative assessment: relationships between teacher knowledge, assessment practice and learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(3), 344-367. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2015.1006521 Izci, K. (2013). Investigating high school chemistry teachers’ perceptions, knowledge and practices of classroom assessment. (Unpublished PhD Thesis), Columbia: University of Missouri-Columbia Lewis, E. & Lu, J. (2017). A Case of fragmented high school earth and space science education in the great plains: Tracing teacher certification policy to students' access. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(3), pp. 304-321 Liu, O., Lee, H., Hofstetter, C., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Assessing knowledge integration in science: Construct, measures, and evidence. Educational Assessment, 13(1), 23 Looney, A., Cumming, J., Kleij, F., & Harris, K. (2017). Reconceptualising the role of teachers as assessors: Teacher assessment identity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2016.1268090 Lyon, E. G. (2011). Beliefs, practices, and reflection: Exploring a science teacher’s classroom assessment through the assessment triangle model. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(5), 417-435. DOI: 10.1007/1097201192414 Lyon, E. G. (2013). What about language while equitably assessing science? Case studies of preservice teachers’ evolving expertise. Teaching and Teacher Education,32, 1-11. Mertler, C. A., & Campbell, C. (2005 April). Measuring teachers’ knowledge and application of classroom assessment concepts: Development of the “Assessment Literacy Inventory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, QC. National Research Council. (2012) A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2014). Designing assessment for next generation science standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Nixon, R. S., Hill, K. M. & Luft, J. A. (2017) Secondary science teachers’ subject matter knowledge development across the first 5 years, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(7), 574-589, DOI: 10.1080/1046560X.2017.1388086 Kang, H., Thompson, J. & Windschitl, M. (2014). Creating opportunities for students to show what they know: The role of scaffolding in assessment tasks. Science Education, 98(4), 674–704. Doi.10.1002/sce.21123 Kang, H. & Anderson, C. W. (2015). Supporting preservice science teachers’ ability to attend and respond to student thinking by design. Science Education, 99(5), 863–895. Knight, S. L., & Duschl, R. A. (2015). Current trends in the framing of teacher qualities. In G. K. LeTendre & A. W. Wiseman (Eds.), Promoting and sustaining a quality teacher workforce: International perspectives on education and society (pp. 443–465). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group. Olson, J. Tippett, D., Milford, M., Ohana, C. & Clough P. (2015) Science teacher preparation in a North American context. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(1), 7-28. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. 2009. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/school/43023606.pdf Otero, V. K. (2006). Moving beyond the “get it or don’t” conception of formative assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 247–255. doi:10.1177/0022487105285963 Quellmalz, E. S., Timms, M. J., Silberglitt, M. D., & Buckley, B. C. (2012). Science assessments for all: Integrating science simulations into balanced state science assessment systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 363-393. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Redding, C., Smith, T. M. (2016). Easy in, easy out: Are alternatively certified teachers turning over at increased rates? American Educational Research Journal, 53, 1086-1125. Ruiz-Primo, M. A. &Furtak E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57-77. Sach, E. (2015). An exploration of teachers' narratives: what are the facilitators and constraints which promote or inhibit ‘good’ formative assessment practices in schools? International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 43(1), 322-335. doi.10.1080/ 03004279.2013.813956 Sandlin B., Harshman J. and Yezierski E. (2015). Formative assessment in high school chemistry teaching: investigating the alignment of teachers' goals with their items. J. Chem. Educ., 92(10), 1619–1625. Serin, G. (2015). Alternative assessment practices of a classroom teacher: Alignment with reform-based science curriculum. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(2), 277–297. Shank, G. (2006). Six alternatives to mixed methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(1), 346–356. doi: 10.1177/1478088706070842 Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29, 4-14. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. Shuls, J. V., & Trivitt, J. R. (2015). Teacher effectiveness: an analysis of licensure screens. Educational Policy, 29(4), 645–675. Siegel, M. A., & Wissehr, C. (2011). Preparing for the plunge: Preservice teachers assessment literacy. (2011). Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 371–391. doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9231-6 Stiggins, R. J. (2008). An introduction to student-involved assessment FOR learning. New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall. Vogelzang, J. & Admiraal, W. F. (2017). Classroom action research on formative assessment in a context-based chemistry course, Educational Action Research, 25(1),155-166, DOI: 10.1080/09650792.2016.1177564 Whitford, D., Zhang D. & Katsiyannis, A. (2018). Traditional vs. Alternative Teacher Preparation Programs: A Meta-Analysis. J Child Fam Stud, 27 (1), 671–685. Xu, Y. & Brown, G.T. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58(1), 149-162. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed. Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Yin, Y., Shavelson, R. J., Ayala, C. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., et al. (2008). On the impact of formative assessment on student motivation, achievement, and conceptual change. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(4), 335–359

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Secondary school teachers’ conceptions of assessment: A systematic review;International Journal of Educational Research;2024

2. High school science teachers’ assessment literacy for inquiry-based science instruction;International Journal of Science Education;2023-08-30

3. Assessor in action: assessment literacy development in a biochemistry context;Chemistry Education Research and Practice;2023

4. Science teachers’ views and uses of assessment criteria: Australian perspectives;The Australian Educational Researcher;2022-08-23

5. Assessment Practices of Grade 8 Physics Teachers in the New Normal: A Multiple Case Study;2021 3rd International Conference on Modern Educational Technology;2021-05-21

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3