SPERM PARAMETERS' PREDICTIVE VALUE IN INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION SUCCESS: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE
Author:
AFŞİN Muhamet1ORCID, NURSAL Ayşe Feyda2ORCID, ÖZÇELİK OTCU Serap Mutlu3ORCID, YAVUZ Dilek4ORCID, EGE Serhat5ORCID
Affiliation:
1. SBÜ Gazi Yaşargil Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 2. HİTİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, DAHİLİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, TIBBİ GENETİK ANABİLİM DALI 3. SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİYARBAKIR GAZİ YAŞARGİL SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ, CERRAHİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, KADIN HASTALIKLARI VE DOĞUM ANABİLİM DALI 4. UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, DİYARBAKIR GAZİ YAŞARGİL HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER 5. DİCLE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, CERRAHİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, KADIN HASTALIKLARI VE DOĞUM ANABİLİM DALI
Abstract
Although intrauterine insemination is a widely used assisted reproductive technique there is no consensus on sperm parameters that affect the probability of pregnancy. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether semen parameters affect intrauterine insemination success. A total of 403 couples (345 negative pregnancies, and 58 positive pregnancy) that underwent 549 intrauterine insemination treatment cycles for heterogenous indications were included in the study. Clomiphen citrate, letrazole and/or gonadotropins were used for ovarian stimulation in women in this study. The spermiogram tests of the spouse of receiving IUI tretment were examined. Clinical pregnancy occurred in 58 of 549 intrauterine insemination (10.56%). Unexplained infertility, polycystic ovary syndrome, and cervical-tubal factors were higher in positive pregnancy group compared to negative pregnancy group while male factor was more prevalant in negative pregnancy group comparison to positive pregnancy group (p=0.03). There was no statistical difference between women with positive and negative pregnancy in terms of age (≤ 35 and > 35), body mass index, infertility type, infertility time, endometrial thickness on HCG day, stimulation protocol, cycle numbers, number of insemination, estradiol, prolactin, LH, FSH, and TSH levels (p>0.05). The sperm characteristics in males [ejaculate volum, sperm concentration, total sperm count, motility, immotility, and total progressive motile sperm count] did not significantly differed between positive and negative pregnancy groups (p>0.05).
Briefly, the present study found that the conception probability of intrauterine insemination did not correlate with the spermiogram parameters.
Publisher
INESEG Yayincilik
Subject
Ocean Engineering
Reference26 articles.
1. De Sutter, P., ‘’Rational diagnosis and treatment in infertility’’, Best Practice Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 20, 647-4, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.04.005. 2. Hum ESHRE, Capri Workshop Group. Intrauterine insemination. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod Update, 15, 265-77, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmp003. 3. Stone, B.A., Vargyas, J.M., Ringler, G.E., Stein, A.L., Marrs, R.P., ‘’Determinants of the outcome of intrauterine insemination: analysis of outcomes of 9963 consecutive cycles’’ Am J Obstet Gynecol, 180(6 Pt 1), 1522-34, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70048-7. 4. van der Westerlaken, L.A., Naaktgeboren, N., Helmerhorst, F.M., ‘’Evaluation of pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination according to indication, age, and sperm parameters’’, J Assist Reprod Genet,15, 359-64, 1998. 5. World Health Organization., ‘’WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. 5th ed. Cambridge’’, Cambridge University 2010.
|
|