Analysis of the fluvial stratigraphic response to the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum in the Bighorn Basin, U.S.A.
Author:
Owen Amanda1, Hartley Adrian J.2, Hoey Trevor B.3, Ebinghaus Alena2, Jolley David W.2, Weissmann Gary S.4
Affiliation:
1. 1 School of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K. 2. 2 Department of Geology and Petroleum Geology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, U.K. 3. 3 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, U.K. 4. 4 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, New Mexico, 87131, U.S.A.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Geological deposits can reveal how environments of the past have responded to climate change, enabling important insights into how environments may respond to our current anthropogenically induced warming. The Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) occurred ca. 56 Ma and was a short-lived (approximately 200,000 years) global warming event (5–8°C rise). The PETM has been investigated at several terrestrial and marine localities across the globe. However, many studies are based on single successions, with very few sites being placed within a well-defined spatial and temporal context and with comparisons limited to deposits that lie immediately above and below the event. Due to the inherent variability of sedimentary systems, it is imperative that the appropriate context is provided to fully understand the impacts of climate change on landscapes and subsequent deposits. This study examines 28 locations, totaling over 4 km of recorded stratigraphy, within a newly defined quantified sedimentary basin context (Bighorn Basin, USA) to evaluate variability of fluvial response to the PETM. We show that channel-body and story thicknesses across the PETM are not statistically significantly different from deposits outside the climate event, implying that there is not a consistent sedimentary response to the climate event across the basin. Based on our large dataset we calculate that precipitation would have had to double for statistically significant changes in deposit thickness to be generated. We discuss how climatic signals may be lost due to the self-organization, spatial–temporal varied response and preservation potential in large fluvial systems. This study gives a new quantified perspective to climate events in the geologic record.
Publisher
Society for Sedimentary Geology
Reference75 articles.
1. Abels,
H.A.,
Kraus,
M.J.,
and
Gingerich,P.D.,
2013,
Precession-scale cyclicity in the fluvial lower Eocene Willwood Formation of the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming (USA):
Sedimentology,
v .
60,
p .
1467–
1483. 2. Blum,
M.D.,
2008,
Large river systems and climate change,
inGupta,A.,ed .,
Large Rivers: Geomorphology and Management:
John Wiley and Sons,
p .
627–
659. 3. Blum,
M.D.,
and
Törnqvist,T.E.,
2000,
Fluvial responses to climate and sea-level change: a review and look forward:
Sedimentology,
v .
47,
p .
2–
48. 4. Bowen,
G.J.,
Maibauer,
B.J.,
Kraus,
M.J.,
Röhl,
U.,
Westerhold., T.,
Steimke,A.,Gingerich,P.D.,Wing,S.L., and
Clyde,W.C.,
2014,
Two massive, rapid releases of carbon during the onset of the Palaeoecene–Eocene Thermal Maximum:
Nature Geoscience,
v .
8,
p .
44–
47. 5. Bown,
T.M.,
and
Kraus,M.J.,
1987,
Integration of channel and floodplain suites, developmental sequence, and lateral relations of alluvial paleosols:
Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,
v .
57,
p .
587–
601.
|
|