Controls on grain-size variability in the Holocene fill of the Indus Submarine Canyon
Author:
Li Yuting1, Clift Peter D.2
Affiliation:
1. 1 Department of Geography and the Environment, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas 76203, U.S.A. 2. 2 Department of Geology and Geophysics and Coastal Studies Institute, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, U.S.A.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
What processes control grain size and bed thickness in submarine canyon deposits? Erosive, shelf-cutting canyons contrast with accretionary basin-floor submarine fan accretionary channels because the former tightly constrain turbidity flows in deep channels. This study addresses such a deep-water depositional system in the Indus Submarine Canyon using a series of cores collected along the canyon. Grain-size analysis was conducted for turbidite and hemipelagic sediment deposited in the Holocene Indus Submarine Canyon mostly by diffuse, fine-grained turbidity currents and hemipelagic hypopycnal plumes. We investigate the links between sedimentary grain size, bedding thickness, facies, and canyon morphology. Well-sorted silt in layers mostly < 2 cm thick dominates the canyon. Core sites in the canyon located downstream of knickpoints have coarser, less well sorted sediments because of current acceleration in these areas and then the slowing of flows downslope. Sediments fine with increasing height above the canyon thalweg, implying deposition from a turbulent plume head. The great depth of the canyon, caused by the exceptionally wide shelf and steep slope, prevents channel overspill which controls sedimentation and channel form in submarine fans. Thalweg sediment fines down-canyon into the mid canyon, where sediment bypassing is inferred. The thickest turbidites are found in the sinuous lower canyon where the gradient shallows from ∼ 0.7° to 0.3°. However, canyon gradient has little impact on mean grain size, but does correlate with bed thickness. The active canyon channel, located in a channel belt gradually becomes less steep, more meandering, and narrower farther downstream. Sinuosity is an influence on turbidite bedding thickness but does not control grain size, in contrast to the situation in submarine-fan channel–levee complexes. Compared to the well-known, more proximal Monterey Canyon of California the grain sizes are much finer, although both systems show evidence of > 200 m plume heads.
Publisher
Society for Sedimentary Geology
Reference108 articles.
1. Amy,
L.A.,
Talling,
P.J.,
Edmonds,
V.O.,
Sumner,
E.J.,
and
Lesueur,A.,
2006,
An experimental investigation of sand–mud suspension settling behaviour: implications for bimodal mud contents of submarine flow deposits:
Sedimentology,
v.53,
p.1411–
1434. 2. Baztan,
J.,
Berné,
S.,
Olivet,
J.L.,
Rabineau,
M.,
Aslanian,
D.,
Gaudin,
M.,
Réhault,
J.P.,
and
Canals,M.,
2005,
Axial incision: the key to understand submarine canyon evolution (in the western Gulf of Lion):
Marine and Petroleum Geology,
v.22,
p.805–
826. 3. Bernhardt,
A.,
Melnick,
D.,
Jara-Muñoz,
J.,
Argandoña,
B.,
González,
J.,
and
Strecker,M.R.,
2015,
Controls on submarine canyon activity during sea-level highstands: the Biobío canyon system offshore Chile:
Geosphere,
v.11,
p.1226–
1255. 4. Best,
T.C.,
and
Griggs,G.B.,
1991,
A sediment budget for the Santa Cruz littoral cell, California,
inOsborne,R.H.,ed.,From Shoreline to Abyss: Contributions in Marine Geology in Honor of Francis Parker Shepard:
SEPM,
Special Publication 46,
p.35–
50. 5. Blatt,
H.,
Middleton,
G.,
and
Murray,R.,
1980,
Origin of Sedimentary Rocks:
Englewood Cliffs,
Prentice-Hall,
782p.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|