CHARACTERIZING MODERN AND HOLOCENE BARRIER-ISLAND ENVIRONMENTS WITH FORAMINIFERAL ASSEMBLAGES: AN EXAMPLE FROM A WAVE-DOMINATED, MICROTIDAL BARRIER-ISLAND SYSTEM, NORTH CAROLINA, USA
Author:
SHMORHUN NINA MARIA-ELENA1, CULVER STEPHEN J.1, MALLINSON DAVID J.1, FARRELL KATHLEEN M.2, CRESSMAN AMY1, GROVE ALISSON1, HOWIE LILLIAN1, LYNN ASHLEY1, SUTTON SETH1, TWAROG MICHAEL1, RIGGS STANLEY R.1
Affiliation:
1. 1 Department of Geological Sciences, Graham 101, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27858, USA 2. 2 North Carolina Geological Survey, 1620 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1620, USA
Abstract
Abstract
Recent research has shown that sedimentological information in barrier-island settings may provide more detailed interpretations of some past coastal environments than interpretations based upon foraminifera. This research investigates whether targeted documentation of modern foraminifera in specific coastal environments can result in higher resolution micropaleontology-based paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Bear Island, North Carolina, characterized by little human disturbance, was chosen for detailed documentation of foraminifera in modern barrier-island-related environments. Modern sediments in all subenvironments were predominantly siliciclastic (< 30 % clastic carbonate debris) in composition: clastic carbonate allochems (e.g., mollusk shell fragments, echinoid spines) were admixed with fine- to medium-grained quartz sand. The hypothesis that modern foraminiferal assemblages of 26 modern coastal subenvironments can be distinguished based upon their foraminiferal assemblages was tested by discriminant analysis and resulted in the recognition of four environmental supergroups: shoreface, ebb-tidal delta, flood-tidal delta/inlet channel, and “barrier-combined” (foreshore, washover, dune, sandflat, spit, longshore bar, and trough). Holocene paleoenvironments represented by foraminiferal assemblages in 16 vibracores collected from the modern inner shelf, shoreface, ebb-tidal delta, and inlet environments of Bogue Banks, immediately adjacent to Bear Island, were interpreted, via discriminant analysis, based upon the modern dataset. Holocene and modern foraminiferal assemblages were similar but variations in species abundance and species diversity allowed for alternative paleoenvironmental classification of core samples at varying levels of probability. The methodology of this research is widely applicable to other coastal environments.
Publisher
Society for Sedimentary Geology
Subject
Paleontology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference90 articles.
1. Abbene,
I.J.,
Culver,
S.J.,
Corbett,
D.R.,
Buzas,
M.A.,
and
Tully,L.S.,
2006,
Distribution of foraminifera in Pamlico Sound, North Carolina, over the past century:
Journal of Foraminiferal Research,
v.36,
p.135–151. 2. Boggs,
S.,
2006,
Principles of Sedimentology and Stratigraphy: Pearson, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ,676p. 3. Buzas,
M.A.,
1979,
The measurement of species diversity,
inLipps,J.HBerger,W.H.Buzas,M.A.Douglas,R.H. and
RossC.(eds.),Foraminiferal Ecology and Paleoecology: SEPM Short Course 6,p.3–10. 4. Buzas,
M.A.
and
Culver,S.J.,
1980,
Foraminifera: distribution of provinces in the western North Atlantic:
Science,
v.209,
p.687–689. 5. Catuneanu,
O.,
2008,
Principles of Sequence Stratigraphy:
Elsevier,
Oxford, UK,
375p.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|