Rethinking Federal Inducement of Pretext Stops

Author:

Heydari Farhang

Abstract

Few topics in policing have received more attention than pretextual traffic stops—traffic stops made for crime-fighting purposes. Community leaders, legislators, police executives, and even presidents have recognized that the overuse of pretext stops has deleterious effects, including racially disparate enforcement, needless death, and degraded public trust in law enforcement. The result is a growing movement at the state and local level to roll back the widespread use of this tactic. As promising as these developments are, most discussions of pretext stops largely omit a key player that drives the problem: the federal government. Presidents from Bush to Biden have decried discriminatory pretext stops and federal investigations have pushed localities to limit their use of the tactic. Yet, behind the scenes, the federal government has long trained and incentivized police to use pretext stops widely. This Article has two goals: First, to demonstrate that the federal government long has been and continues to be a key driver of pretextual traffic stops by state and local law enforcement. The Article catalogs the multitude of ways that federal agencies push this tactic, and in the process, tells a complex story about how the federal government sets national policing policy. The federal actors involved include law enforcement agencies (as one might expect), but also other administrative agencies whose ostensible missions seem to have little to do with policing. Second, this Article calls for the federal government to develop a new, comprehensive, and coherent approach to traffic stops as a crime-fighting tool—an approach that centers on public safety and avoids falling into tired patterns of harmful and discriminatory enforcement. This Article proposes a variety of tangible reforms, such as changing federal law enforcement policy, creating a centralized review process for federal policing programs, and developing a method to calculate the social cost of a traffic stop. A strong federal response—in tandem with continued state and local action—is the only way to wean policing off traffic stops as a central crime-fighting tool.

Publisher

University of Wisconsin Law School

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3