Optimization of Formic Acid-Formalin-Based Decalcification Protocol for Rat Calvarial Bone Histology
-
Published:2024-05-15
Issue:2
Volume:12
Page:218-225
-
ISSN:2320-8694
-
Container-title:Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:J Exp Bio & Ag Sci
Author:
Banu S. AmithaORCID, Sharun KhanORCID, Mamachan MerlinORCID, Subash AthiraORCID, Deekshita VadapalliORCID, Sharma KirtikaORCID, Mathesh KarikalanORCID, Vinodh kumar Obli RajendranORCID, Maiti Swapan KumarORCID, M. Pawde AbhijitORCID, Abualigah LaithORCID, Dhama KuldeepORCID, Amarpal
Abstract
Decalcification is crucial in histological processing, particularly for studying mineralized tissues like bone. The choice of decalcification method can significantly impact the quality of histological sections and the preservation of tissue morphology. This study aims to establish a standardized protocol for decalcifying rat calvarial bone using a formic acid-formalin-based decalcification solution. The protocol was systematically optimized and evaluated based on various parameters, including decalcification time, formic acid concentration, and tissue integrity preservation. The decalcification process was evaluated through comprehensive assessments, including gross physical examination, chemical analysis, and radiographic imaging techniques. Our result demonstrated that the 10% formic acid concentration proved most effective for decalcifying rat calvarial bone samples within eight days, excelling in mineral content removal while preserving specimen structural integrity. In contrast, the 5% concentration failed to complete decalcification within ten days, and the 15% compromised sample quality within eight days. Histological analyses confirmed the efficacy of the 10% formic acid concentration in maintaining tissue integrity and achieving optimal staining quality. The standardized protocol presented in this study provides an effective and reliable approach for achieving consistent and high-quality histological sections of rat calvarial bone. An ideal decalcification agent should effectively remove calcium salts, preserve structural integrity and molecular components, facilitate rapid yet minimally damaging decalcification, and ensure ease of handling for laboratory personnel. Further exploration of its applicability to different bone types or species is recommended to broaden its research utility.
Publisher
Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences
Reference21 articles.
1. Abou Neel, E., Aljabo, A., Strange, A., Ibrahim, S., Coathup, M., et al. (2016). Demineralization-remineralization dynamics in teeth and bone. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 11, 4743–4763. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S107624 2. Bancroft, J. D., & Gamble, M. (Eds.). (2008). Theory and practice of histological techniques. Elsevier Health Sciences. 3. Barrère, F., van Blitterswijk, C. A., & de Groot, K. (2006). Bone regeneration: molecular and cellular interactions with calcium phosphate ceramics. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 1(3), 317–332. 4. Bogoevski, K., Woloszyk, A., Blackwood, K., Woodruff, M. A., & Glatt, V. (2019). Tissue Morphology and Antigenicity in Mouse and Rat Tibia: Comparing 12 Different Decalcification Conditions. The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 67(8), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1369/0022155419850099 5. Callis, G., & Sterchi, D. (1998). Decalcification of Bone: Literature Review and Practical Study of Various Decalcifying Agents, Methods, and Their Effects on Bone Histology. The Journal of Histotechnology, 21, 49-58.
|
|