Abstract
This paper examines the Siberian films by Anastasia Lapsui and Markku Lehmuskallio. It focuses on filmic means em-ployed in order to “film back” to outsider cinema. Applying film analysis as a method, it demonstrates how film form can be as political as content when used to give voice to Siberia indige-nous peoples and re-view earlier Soviet discourse of equality, integration and progress. It highlights two aesthetic strategies used by the filmmakers to “film back:” the re-appropriation of archival footage to rework the past and recredit indigenous in-dividuals; and the creation of a plural pseudo-autobiographical voice to break the Soviet monologue and embody the shared indigenous experience. Finally, it argues that looking at formal aspects helps to rethink our understanding of such notions as “talking back” and “shooting back,” often used indifferently, with the addition of the “filming back” concept, reserved to filmic issues.
Publisher
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Reference44 articles.
1. ANASHKIN, Sergey; SAVVINA, Sardaana; PARK, Jim (Eds.). Sakha Cinema: The World of Mysterious Nature and Myth. Busan: Busan International Film Festival, 2017.
2. ANASHKIN, Sergey. “A panorama of Russia’s ethnic cinema.” KinoKultura. n. 63, 2019. http://www.kinokultura.com/2019/63-anashkin.shtml.
3. ANDERSON, David G. CAMPBELL Craig. “Picturing Central Siberia. The Digitization and Analysis of Early Twentieth-Century Central Siberian Photographic Collections.” Sibirica. Interdisciplinary Journal of Siberian Studies, vol. 8, n. 2, 2009, pp. 1-42.
4. ARUTIUNOVA, V. “Bol’shaia Ob’: Taisia Lapsui – zhurnalistka i diktor.” Sovetskoe radio i televidenie, n. 12, 1970, pp. 20-23.
5. ARZYUTOV DMITRY V. “Samoyedic diary: Early Years of Visual Anthropology in the Soviet Arctic.” Visual Anthropology. vol. 29, n. 4-5, 2016, pp. 331-359.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Editorial;Proa: Revista de Antropologia e Arte;2021-07-24