Abstract
The paper analyzes pleonastic conditionals (e.g., sweetheart, I understand. If you have to go, you have to go) in Huasteca Nahuatl, an Uto-Aztecan language spoken in Mexico. Based on conversational data, it is demonstrated that pleonastic conditionals in Huasteca Nahuatl have different discourse-pragmatic functions, such as surprise, disagreement, and indifference, etc. Moreover, it is argued that the different discourse-pragmatic functions of pleonastic conditionals are systematically associated with specific syntactic forms of the apodosis (i.e., whether the apodosis is a precise echo of the protasis or not) and with specific lexical preferences (i.e., verb lemmas appearing in the protasis and apodosis). It is proposed that these preferential co-occurrences are shaped by three usage-based factors: iconicity, discourse economy, and semantic coherence.
Publisher
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Reference58 articles.
1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (1998). Warekena. In Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), Handbook of Amazonian languages 4, pp. 225-439. Mouton de Gruyter.
2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2012). The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16(3): 435-485. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0017
3. Bazzanella, Carla (2011). Redundancy, repetition, and intensity in discourse. Language Sciences 33(2): 243-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2010.10.002
4. Beller, Richard & Patricia Beller (1979). Huasteca Nahuatl. In Ronald W. Langacker (ed.), Studies in Uto-Aztecan grammar 2: Modern Aztec grammatical sketches, pp. 199-306. Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington. Available at: https://www.sil.org/resources/archives/8716
5. Bolden, Galina. B. (2006). Little words that matter: Discourse markers ‘so’ and ‘oh’ and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction. Journal of Communication 56(4): 661-688 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00314.x