Author:
Abelson Julia,Mendelsohn Matthew,Lavis John N.,Morgan Steven G.,Forest Pierre-Gerlier,Swinton Marilyn
Publisher
Health Affairs (Project Hope)
Reference12 articles.
1. Although their mandates, timelines, and structures differ from one another, they loosely parallel presidential, legislative, and foundation commissions in the United States in their ad hoc and time limited mandates. For a review and key recommendations of these commissions (excluding the final report of the Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada), see C. Fooks and S. Lewis, “Romanow and Beyond: A Primer on Health Reform Issues in Canada,” Discussion Paper no. H05 (Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks, November 2002). Regarding perceptions of the need for reform, see K. Donelan et al. “The Cost of Health System Change: Public Discontent in Five Nations,”Health Affairs18, no. 3 ( 1999 ): 206 –216.
2. American Political Culture and the Search for Lessons from Abroad
3. and P.J. Devereaux et al. “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Mortality Rates of Private For-Profit and Private Not-for-Profit Hospitals,”Canadian Medical Association Journal166, no. 11 ( 2002 ): 1399 –1406.
4. Primary Care In Canada: So Much Innovation, So Little Change
5. Reins or Fences: A Physician's View of Cost Containment
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献