1. to view contents of a DVD to which such measures have been applied), nor did it recognise that the defendant had no commercial interest. It also ignored any discussion on matters of the dogmatic characterisation of Article 6(2) of the Copyright Directive, as implemented, and did not address the potential conflict with press freedom under the German Constitution. See further Westkamp G;of regional DVD encoding. The court neither considered that the technology in question was offered for purposes of non-infringing uses
2. ASHDOWN v. TELEGRAPH GROUP LTD
3. A Fundstellenverzeichnis der Entscheidungen des Bundesgerichtshofes