1. Noting the "two-fold picture of morality" in the ECtHR's case law, Nowlin characterized the two positions as corresponding, respectively, to Devlin's legal moralism and to John Stuart Mill's more "restricted meaning;Christopher See;Human Rights Quarterly,2002
2. Public Morals, Consensus, and Rights Inflation: A Critique
3. Supplementum Epigraphicum GraecumNamara. Stela sep. Op. cit. 570, n. 99.
4. See also, more generally (not specifically in the context of the ECtHR, Kumm at 145: "reasons related to the furtherance of specific perfectionist ideals ? are excluded both at the first prong of the proportionality test, since they are not a legitimate purpose that can justify infringements of individual liberty, and at the level of balancing?;Similarly See;The Global Model of Constitutional Rights,2012