Earmarking Away the Public Interest: How Congressional Republicans Use Antiregulatory Appropriations Riders to Benefit Powerful Polluting Industries

Author:

McGarity Thomas Owen,Murphy Richard W.,Goodwin James

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Reference39 articles.

1. Separate House and Senate rules technically prohibit any such riders that create new law or change existing ones by, for example, creating new rulemaking requirements. These rules have been interpreted as not prohibiting limitation riders, however, which arguably do not change or create law and are applicable for a defined period of time. Even with respect to legislative riders, the rules are often flouted when the rules committees of both houses liberally issue waivers for riders the leadership prefers and deny waivers for riders the leadership opposes. Thomas O. McGarity, Deregulatory Riders Redux, 1 MICH;Members might also attempt to include "legislative riders" that are antiregulatory in nature, such as provisions that require agencies to undertake new onerous processes while implementing regulatory programs,2006

2. Joseph Francis McGarity

3. Trump's EPA Will Kill Clean Power Plan, Delaying Crucial Climate Protection

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3