1. Museum News
2. App. 1976) (same result where the testator "specifically declared that all property in her name was her sole and separate property" and the no contest clause applied to attempts to "contest [the will], or any of its parts or provisions"). But see Estate of Richter;Cal. Rptr. 2d
3. dispose of any particular assets" nor "state[d] unequivocally [that items in the estate] were his separate property"); Estate of Black;App. 1993) (holding that surviving spouse's assertion of community property rights was not a contest when the testator neither "purport,1957