1. Fines Against Hard Core Cartels in Europe: The Myth of Over Enforcement;. E Combe;56 Antirust Bull,2011
2. stating that imprisonment has decreasing marginal utility in that a defendant views every additional year of prison time as less of a punishment than the previous year). See also D. Ginsburg & J. Wright, Deterrence and Punishment in Antitrust: Antitrust Sanctions, 8 Competition Pol'y Int'l 46, 70 n;J See;Corporate Crime and Punishment: A Non-Chicago View of the Economics of Criminal Sanctions,1980
3. Bureau Prisons estimates the average cost to incarcerate a prisoner in a federal prison is approximately $31,000 per year;U S The;See Federal Register,2015
4. do not preclude separate sovereigns for subsequent prosecutions of the same persons for the same offenses. M. Morosin, Double Jeopardy and International Law: Obstacles to Formulating a General Principle, 64 Nordic J;N Bourtin;Some jurisdictions may be precluded by restrictive interpretations of double jeopardy protections or ne bis in idem from subsequent individual prosecutions such that the exercise of negative comity is not only unnecessary but precluded by law,1995