1. Ill. 1988) (court indicated that non-opt out class action could not be used to avoid the TIA's requirement of unanimous noteholder consent to changes in payment terms;Id;19-20. But see Continental Assurance Co. v. Macleod-Stedman, Inc., 694 F. Supp
2. Are Rule 23 Actions a Viable Alternative to the Bankruptcy Code?;This theory has its critics. See Richard L. Epling
3. Ill.) (unpublished Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order) (investor brought suit individually and as class representative of defaulted secured notes; court certified the case as mandatory class action and approved a negotiated settlement;Kemper Investors Life Ins. Co. v. Las Colinas Corp., No. 88C 9162
4. th Cir. 1991), appeal dismissed sub nom., Croyden Associates v;The Harry;Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) �,1992