1. Plama Consortium Limited v. Republic of Bulgaria (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24)
2. Author Index
3. at 143-5; in this respect see also Tokios Tokel�s v. Ukraine, cit., at 86 'Even if we were able to confirm the Respondent's allegations, which would require a searching examination of minute details of administrative procedures in Ukrainian law, to exclude an investment on the basis of such minor errors would be inconsistent with the object and purpose of the Treaty. In our view, the Respondent's registration of each of the Claimant's investments indicates that the 'investment' in question was made in accordance with the laws and regulations of Ukraine.' As to the conformity of covered investments with international law, see Inceysa Vallisoletana S.L. v. The Republic of El Salvador;ARB/05/17, Award,2006