1. Justice Chin's opinion made it clear that the court had not forgotten either the cases or the questions they posed. Indeed, early in Subsection II.A of his opinion, Justice Chin wrote: In Lockheed Litigation Cases . . ., the plaintiffs argued that under Evidence Code section 801, subdivision (b), "a court should determine only whether the type of matter that an expert relies on in forming his or her opinion is the type of matter that an expert can rely on in forming an opinion;Although five years passed between the dismissal of the Lockheed Litigation Cases and the court's opinion in Sargon
2. Evidence Code Section 802: The Neglected Key to Rationalizing the California Law of Expert Testimony, 42 Loy;J Edward;L.A.L.Rev,2009
3. Bardis v. Capitol Racing, 2006 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 3998 (Cal. Ct. App. May 10, 2006)