1. Ibid at para 39. See also Multani v Commission Scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys;SCR 256 at paras
2. This re-affirms the subjective-objective test for section 2(a) breaches, and may alleviate concerns that "virtually any belief, founded in some tenet of the worker's faith, sincerely held, will trigger the onerous duty to accommodate to the point of undue hardship": 407 ETR Concession Co v CAWCanada, Local 414;CarswellOnt,2007