1. Exposition: Reading, writing, and the metacognitive knowledge of learning disabled students;C S Allal & Chanquoy ; Citing;LEARNING DISABILITIES RESEARCH,1998
2. Recall that Marie spent only 15.5 hours revising both her pre-trial and appellate briefs, whereas Sonya and Art spent approximately 65 hours revising, or four times as much time as Marie. Neither Sonya nor Art questioned the fairness of Professor Lee's grading style, whereas Marie felt that Professor Lee's grading was "confusing;A Graham;Learning disabled and normally achieving students' knowledge of the writing and composing process, attitude toward writing, and self-efficacy,1989
3. Writing Instruction
4. Marie cited to a secondary rather than a primary source for the rule, and she failed to explain a critical part of the rule. Marie also gave only one version of a fact when there was a conflict in the evidence on that point. Professor Lee also commented that Marie's arguments on three of the factors tended to be somewhat superficial and generally needed more development and support from the analogous cases;Professor Lee commented that the 609 issue was being decided under the Washington Rules of Evidence, not the Federal Rules of Evidence. In addition