1. 600). Science does not have an answer to the questions of 'what weights' or 'what thresholds;-making and cost-benefit analysis,2006
2. There is some discussion of this question in the Appellate Body's EC-Hormones ruling. The Appellate Body noted that a panel charged with determining whether "sufficient scientific evidence" exists to warrant a particular SPS measure "may? and should, bear in mind that responsible, representative governments commonly act from perspectives of prudence and precaution where risks of irreversible, e.g. life-terminating, damage to human health are concerned". 58 Another possible source from which one can draw is the field of environmental impact assessment;An important element of the PP's second interpretation concerns the unique circumstances in which it applies