1. To the extent that my argument in this Part questions the supposed indubitability of certain legal claims based on their conceptual or semantic (or criterial) nature, my argument is Quinean in spirit. For wide-ranging Quinean reflections on the use of conceptual analysis in legal philosophy;North America, philosophers have for many years thought that conceptual analysis as a philosophical method had been thoroughly discredited by the criticisms of W.V,1998
2. Moral Conflicts
3. The Foundations of Impartiality;E G;HARE AND CRITICS: ESSAYS ON MORAL THINKING,1988