On the Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment: New Experimental Evidence-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

On the Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment: New Experimental Evidence

Published:2008 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1556-5068
Container-title:SSRN Electronic Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:SSRN Journal

Author:

Charness Gary,Karni Edi,Levin Dan

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Reference17 articles.

1. Are Two Heads Better than One? An Experimental Analysis of Group versus Individual Decision-making;Alan Blinder;Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking,2005

2. Individual and Group Decision Making under risk: An Experimental Study of Bayesian Updating and Violations of FirstOrder Stochastic Dominance;Gary Charness;Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,2007

3. Are Two Heads Better Than One? Team versus Individual Play in Signaling Games;David Cooper;American Economic Review,2005

4. When and Why do people avoid unknown probabilities in decisions under uncertainty? Testing some predictions from optimal foraging theory;Rodea Catrin;Cognition,1999

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The effect of incentivization on the conjunction fallacy in judgments: a meta-analysis;Psychological Research;2023-05-25

2. Misperception of Chance, Conjunction, Framing Effects and Belief in the Paranormal: A Further Evaluation;Applied Cognitive Psychology;2016-03-19

3. Misconceptions and Game Form Recognition of the BDM Method: Challenges to Theories of Revealed Preference and Framing;SSRN Electronic Journal;2012

4. On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment: New experimental evidence regarding Linda;Games and Economic Behavior;2010-03

5. Can groups solve the problem of over-bidding in contests?;Social Choice and Welfare;2009-12-03