1. 2018) (formulating this test initially); see also League of Women Voters of Mich;M D N;See Common Cause v. Rucho, 318 F. Supp. 3d
2. In particular, they have formulated the three prongs as: 1. Did the State consider citizens' protected First Amendment conduct with an intent to burden those citizens because of their political beliefs? 2. If so, did the redistricting map, in fact, dilute the votes of the targeted citizens or disrupt their political association in a discernable and concrete way? 3. If so, is there a constitutionally acceptable explanation for the map's ill effects;Brief for Appellees, supra note 197