1. 7(customer) and 9(customer) in tables 2. and 3 above was posed after being compared to Questions 6(customer), of which the responses were tested using the chi -square instrument of analysis and the results presented in table .1, table 2. and table 3 above;which was aimed at determining whether Lafarge Cement Wapco Nigeria Plc sees Corporate Social Responsibility as an obligation to its host community? Questions 5(customer)
2. 15(staff) and 17(staff) in tables 3, above was posed after being compared to Questions 16(staff), of which the responses were tested using the chisquare instrument of analysis and the results presented in table 3 above., it also was discovered that the Pvalue i.e. 0.013, 0.000, 0.007 was less than ? -value. Since the decision rule states that reject H0, if Pvalue is less than ? -value which is 0.05 i.e. 5% significance level otherwise reject H1. Therefore, we reject H0. Based on the analytical findings for testing hypothesis three, it was concluded thatEffective monitoring and evaluation by all stakeholders of Lafarge Cement Wapco Nigeria;this was aimed at determining whether Effective monitoring and evaluation by all stakeholders of Lafarge Cement Wapco Nigeria Plc reduces the incidence of the company treating Corporate Social Responsibility with levity. Questions 13(staff)
3. which was aimed at determining whether Lafarge Cement Wapco Nigeria Plc management's failure to observe key principles of Corporate Social Responsibility does have an effect on the incidence and occurrence of damage and other adverse effects on its host community? Questions 8(staff), 11(staff) and 12(staff) in tables 4 above was posed after being compared to Questions 4(staff), of which the responses were tested using the chi -square instrument of analysis and the results BIBLIOGRAPHY Abort;W Moson;Academy of Management Journal Review,1979