1. It was no exaggeration to say that the no conflict rule is 'for the safety of mankind', per James LJ Parker v McKenna (1874) 10 Ch App 96. See further;developing the strict application of the no possibility of conflict principle, overturning Bromfield v Wytherley (1718) Prec Ch 505 decided by the corrupt Lord Macclesfield LC
2. Product Safety Regulation as a Model for Financial Services Regulation;E Warren;Journal of Corporate Law Studies,2008
3. ss 380-474), virtually all other securities (eg Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 ss 79-80), and in numerous ways for consumers, employees and tenants. If one counted how many contracts made each day required material disclosure, what proportion would be covered by the commercial principle in Smith v Hughes (1871) LR 6 QB 597;App Cas 1218 and,2006