1. it is no reason, when the words of a law do enough extend to an inconvenience seldom happening, that they should not extend to it as well as if it happened more frequently, because it happens but seldom;the words further than they reach, by saying it is casus omissus, and that the law intended quae frequentius accidunt
2. Union Of India;Sangeeta Singh V;SCC 484. BIBLIOGRAPHY Authorities Referred,2005
3. Leather (1965) 2 All ER 441 3;Kirby V;re,1878
4. John Hess, Chief Executive Officer, Altius Associates Ltd