1. Visibility Protection Under the Clean Air Act
2. Proving an intentionally false promise can be quite difficult. Allegations of mere breach of FRAND obligations are insufficient;Id;TCL Commc'ns Tech. Holdings, Ltd. v. Telefonaktienbolaget LM Ericsson
3. ) (granting summary judgment against TCL's claim that Ericsson violated California's Unfair Competition Law by making an "intentionally false promise" regarding its FRAND obligations because "TCL does not identify even innuendo of Ericsson making intentionally false promises to ETSI;C D Cal;WL,2016
4. geschlossener See(schiff)kanal m