Author:
Wang Hao,Hu Enyi,Zhu Bin,Yang Fan,Lund Peter
Reference59 articles.
1. is represented by the peak at 1073.1 eV at the higher binding energy position [51]. Compared with the XPS spectra of C, O, Na, Ni, Fe and Mn elements in the NFMNa in previous work [31]. For XPS spectra of C 1s and Na 1s, the ratio of peak area of CO2-3 to calibration peak of carbon (Fig. 5a) and Na?O-C to lattice sodium of;Fig. 5d-f provide XPS spectra of Ni 2+ 2p, Fe 3+ 2p and Mn 4+ 2p
2. Technical and environmental analysis on the power production from residual biomass using hydrogen as energy vector;N Sanchez;Renew. Energy,2021
3. Performance evaluation of a geothermal and solarbased multigeneration system and comparison with alternative case studies: Energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic aspects;O F Guler;Renew. Energy,2022
4. Emerging renewable and sustainable energy technologies: State of the art;A Hussain;Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev,2017