Abstract
Aim/purpose – The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of HRM practices on OCB-I (altruism and courtesy) and OCB-O (sportsmanship, conscientiousness, and civic virtue) by examining the mediating role of organizational justice perceptions (i.e., distributional, procedural, and interactional justice) and the moderating role of gender. Design/methodology/approach – The study is based on a national sample of 10 organi- zations from the banking industry in Kosovo and data were obtained from 459 employ- ees. The statistical method involved regression analyses by constructing 14 different models through controlling demographics and the Sobel test for testing the moderator hypotheses. Findings – The findings of the study suggest that there are positive relations between HRM practices and both OCB-I and OCB-O. Additionally, HRM practices show posi- tive relations with justice perceptions, while justice perceptions show positive relations with both OCB-I and OCB-O. Furthermore, justice perceptions play a mediating role in the relationship between HRM practices and both OCB-I and OCB-O. Gender moderates the relationship between HRM practices and justice perceptions, showing a positive relationship for females but a negative one for males. Lastly, gender also moderates the relationship between justice perceptions and OCB-O, being positive for males but nega- tive for females. Research implications/limitations – Limitations of this study include uncertainties in determining the most suitable HRM practices for assessing their impact on OCBs, poten- tial method bias from the limited sample, and limited generalizability beyond Kosovo’s banking sector due to cultural variations. Originality/value/contribution – This study provides a comprehensive understanding of HRM practices, organizational justice, and OCBs within Kosovo’s banking sector. The findings not only contribute to theoretical knowledge but also offer practical insights for Kosovan commercial banks, emphasizing the importance of evaluating HRM prac- tices and justice perceptions to enhance employee behaviors crucial for organizational success. Keywords: HRM practices, justice perceptions, citizenship behavior, gender. JEL Classification: M10, M12, M19.
Publisher
University of Economics in Katowice
Reference51 articles.
1. Inequity in social exchange;Adams;In L Berkowitz (Ed ) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol,1965
2. Bal, P. M., & De Lange, A. H. (2015). From flexibility human resource management to employee engagement and perceived job performance across the lifespan: A multisample study. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 88(1), 126-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12082
3. You paid for the skills, now keep them: Tuition reimbursement and voluntary turnover;Benson;The Academy of Management Journal,2004
4. Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 289-319). JAI Press.
5. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43-55). JAI Press.