Semantic Analysis on the Police Lingo in the Narratives of BS LEAD Students: A Forensic Linguistic Study

Author:

Pineda SusanORCID,Ruiz Annie,Mayo VergelORCID

Abstract

This study looks into the terminologies (police lingo) in the write-ups of Bachelor of Science in Law Enforcement Administration fourth-year students to illustrate the categorical and descriptive meanings of the words used in the narratives, identify the errors in the usage, and find out inaccuracies in the application of mechanics of writing like correct spelling, capitalization, abbreviation, and punctuation marks. Twenty-six (26) (BSLEAD) students participated in this study. They were instructed to write a narrative report in one of their experiences in the field. Police lingo identified in the statements such as nouns, verbs, and adjectives, were singled out from the narratives. These words were analyzed to determine whether they clearly stated their intention and described vividly what they meant to say. Semantic analysis was done by giving the dictionary definition of the word in the first level (categorical meaning as to parts of speech) and the illustrative meaning of the word in the second analysis (descriptive meaning), hence, the police lingo in the narratives were explained and described as to their literal meanings and clarity of intention as used in the statements. Results showed that male and female respondents have a similar choice of police lingo in writing the context of utterances in the narrative reports. They also committed errors in writing mechanics such as punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. It is recommended that the BSLEAD students engage in language learning activities like conversation using English, reading forensic texts, and listening/watching investigative programs on the radio or television that use English as a medium.

Publisher

Camarines Sur Polytechnic Colleges

Reference23 articles.

1. Aher, M. (2016). The Semantics of discourse as evidence. Paper in Forensic Linguistics: Tartu University, Estonia.

2. Ang, E. (2016). The narrative of the police: Language features, organizational structures, and communicative functions of Philippine police report Paper in Forensic Linguistics University of Santo Tomas. Asian Regional Conference of the International Association of Forensic Linguistics.

3. Chomsky, N. (1965). Persistent Topics in Linguistic Theory. Diogenes, 13(51), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/039219216501305102

4. Cotton, K. (2003). Research You Can Use To Improve Results. Update of Section 3. Program Report.

5. Crabbe, D. (2003). The Quality of Language Learning Opportunities. TESOL Quarterly, 37. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588464

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3