Is the Earnings Quality of Family Businesses Better Than Non-family Businesses?

Author:

Purba Golrida Karyawati1,Surya Audrey Natasha1,Joshi Prem Lal2,Tyagi Anshu3

Affiliation:

1. Universitas Pelita Harapan, Indonesia

2. MMU Malaysia and UOB, Bahrain

3. Rukmini Devi Institute of Advanced Studies, GGSIPU, New Delhi, India

Abstract

Objective - This study aims to prove whether the earnings quality of family businesses is better than non-family businesses to address two conflicting theories regarding the quality of family business earnings: agency theory and socioemotional wealth theory. Methodology/Technique –. This research uses a regression model to examine the influence of family business/non-family business characteristics on earnings quality. To obtain robust results, this research measures earnings quality using 5 measurement proxies, including measurements of available opportunities for earnings management, earnings management practices, earnings persistence, earnings restatement, and investor responsiveness to earnings quality. The screening sample was carried out on firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the period 2016–2020, resulting in 932 research observations. Findings - Overall, this research proves that FB earnings quality is better than NFB earnings quality. The results of this study extend the implementation of socioemotional wealth theory in explaining the characteristics of FB, in which the characteristics of FB and non-FB have an impact on earnings quality. Novelty - Financial statement analysts can utilize the results of this study in interpreting earnings quality based on the characteristics of FB and NFB. Type of Paper: Empirical JEL Classification: M41, M49. Keywords: Earnings Quality, Family Business (FB), Non-family Business (NFB), Socioemotional Wealth Theory Reference to this paper should be referred to as follows: Purba, G.K; Surya, A.N; Joshi, P.L; Tyagi, A. (2023). Is the Earnings Quality of Family Businesses Better Than Non-family Businesses?, Acc. Fin. Review, 8(2), 36 – 53. https://doi.org/10.35609/afr.2023.8.2(1)

Publisher

Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3