Access to Information of Disabled People on the Web: A Dispute between Accessibility and Digital Rights Management

Author:

Lamlert Wariya1ORCID,Sawetrattanasatian Oranuch2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Graduate School of Law, National Institute of Development Administration, Serithai Rd. Bangkapi, 10240, Bangkok, Thailand

2. Department of Library Science, Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University, Phyathai Rd. Patumwan, 10330, Bangkok, Thailand

Abstract

Objective - The study aims to explore the dispute between accessibility and Digital Rights Management (DRM) for disabled people in accessing information on the Web. More specifically, this paper explores the challenges DRM has placed on them. Methodology/Technique –This study inspects the controversial interaction between accessibility and DRM in relation to disabled people’s access to information on the Web using document analysis from a socio-legal perspective. Further, the black-letter law of some widely known and internationally cited regulations are used in the investigation and discussion. Findings & Novelty- It is argued that the regulations which are beneficial to the accessibility of disabled people are overruled by DRM. More specifically, the challenges posed by DRM include: (1) Negligence of disabled people’s rights, (2) Conflict of accessibility, and (3) Ignorance of copyright-related exceptions. This study is a cross disciplinary study probing the issue of disabled people in both legal studies, through relevant legislation, and information studies, through the topic of information access on the Web. It examines and analyses major regulations issued by leading organizations across the two disciplines. The findings of this study may be beneficial to knowledge and practice to bridge the gap of human rights for information access, particularly for disabled people, and argues that both information and legal professionals should be responsible for this. Type of Paper: Review

Publisher

Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise

Reference32 articles.

1. Caldwell, B., Cooper, M., Reid, L. G. and Vanderheiden, G. (Eds.). (2010). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.0). Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/

2. CBM. (2016). What Links Disability, Human Rights and the Sustainable Development Goals? Retrieved from https://www. cbm.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/CRPD-A4LEAFLET-2-inhouseprint.pdf

3. Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute. (n.d.). 17 US code § 121. Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Reproduction for Blind or Other People with Disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/121

4. Daubs, M. S. (2017). HTML5, Digital Rights Management (DRM), and the Rhetoric of Openness. Journal of Media Critiques, 3(9), 77-94. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313232499_HTML5_Digital_ Rights_ Management_DRM_and_the_Rhetoric_of_Openness.

5. Doctorow, C., IP Justice, I. P. J., Electronic Frontier Finland, E. F. F. F., Vereniging Open Source Nederland, V. O. S. N., & European Digital Rights Initiative. (2005). Digital Rights Management (DRM): a failure in the developed world, a danger to the developing world. A paper for the International Telecommunications Union, ITU-R Working Party 6M Report on Content Protection Technologies http://eprints.rclis.org/6917/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3