Game analysis between startup and banks

Author:

Chengzhuo Zhang1,Azman Nik Hadiyan Binti Nik1

Affiliation:

1. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

Abstract

Objective - Due to information asymmetry, banks cannot know all the information about a company during the financing process. Compared to large firms, start-ups face more difficulties in obtaining debt financing. In order to investigate how the game between start-ups and banks maximizes the benefits of debt financing, this study is based on the game process between start-ups and banks in complete and incomplete information markets. Methodology/Technique – The model assumes deterministic and relatively simple financial decisions, and game theory provides a way to gain insight into the mechanistic phenomenon of debt financing for start-ups by allowing for the inclusion of asymmetric information and strategic interactions in the analysis. Finding – The game process of debt financing for start-ups is studied from a game theoretical perspective to reveal the optimal decisions of both parties in the game process under the influence of information asymmetries, i.e., the basic laws governing the operation of debt financing for start-ups and the important criteria and procedures to ensure that debt financing works correctly. Novelty – The study shows that high-quality start-ups are more likely to receive bank loans than low-quality firms that are willing to pay high-interest rates. Type of Paper: Empirical JEL Classification: C7, C72. Keywords: Asymmetric Information theory; Game Theory; Debt Financing; Startup. Reference to this paper should be referred to as follows: Chengzhuo, Z; Azman, N.H.B.N. (2023). Game analysis between startup and banks, GATR-Global J. Bus. Soc. Sci. Review, 11(1), 01–08. https://doi.org/10.35609/gjbssr.2023.11.1(1)

Publisher

Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise

Subject

General Medicine

Reference17 articles.

1. Ahmed, B., Akbar, M., Sabahat, T., Ali, S., Hussain, A., Akbar, A., & Hongming, X. (2020). Does a firm life cycle impact corporate investment efficiency? Sustainability, 13(1), 197.

2. Allen, F., & Gale, D. (2000). Comparing financial systems. MIT Press.

3. Allen, F., & Morris, S. (1998). Finance applications of game theory.

4. Bhattacharya, S., & Thakor, A. V. (1993). Contemporary banking theory. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 3(1), 2–50.

5. Chen, D.H., Zhou, F. (2005). Static Analysis of Insurance Agents’ Violations and Countermeasures for Prevention - Based on Game Theory Model Analysis. Journal of Insurance Vocational College, (02), 12–15.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3