Affiliation:
1. Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak, 78124, Indonesia
Abstract
Objective – Inequality of regional income, government expenditure and government revenue can show the performance of these variables in improving the economic and non-economic conditions of each region. Previous literature discusses, in part, the inequality among these three variables. This research fills the gap left by previous research by analyzing the inequality of the three variables and analysing the relationship between them in driving the provincial economy in Kalimantan. The first objective of this study is to analyze the reduction of regional income inequality, government revenue and government expenditure. The second objective is to analyze the relationship among macro variables.
Methodology/Technique – Using data from 4 provinces in Kalimantan across a 15-year period (2002-2016), this study concludes that in the short term, only changes of government revenue have an impact on regional income and only changes of government revenue has an impact on government expenditure.
Findings - Meanwhile, in the long term, changes in regional income, government revenue, and government expenditure can all have an impact on regional income.
Type of Paper: Empirical.
Keywords: Inequality; Regional Income; Government Expenditure; Government Revenue.
Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Kurniawati, S; Lestari, N. 2019. Sigma Convergence and VECM Approach in Explaining the Relationship among Macro Variables in Indonesia, J. Bus. Econ. Review 4(4) 156 – 162 https://doi.org/10.35609/jber.2019.4.4(2)
JEL Classification: H70, E00, E10, O11.
Publisher
Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise
Reference22 articles.
1. Aidam, P. W. (2018) Dynamics between Government Capital Expenditure and Revenue in Ghana: A Vector Erroe Correction Model Approach. International Journal of Academic and Apllied Research, 2 (11). 27-38.
2. Aisha, Z., & Khatoon, S. (2009). Government Expenditure and Tax Revenue, Causality and Cointegration: The Experience of Pakistan (1972–2007). The Pakistan Development Review, 48(4-II), 951-959. http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/2009/Volume4/951-959.pdf
3. Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, XX. (1995). Economic Growth. McGraw-Hill, New York.
4. Coughlin, C. C., Garrett, T. A., & Hernández-Murillo, R. (2007). Spatial dependence in models of state fiscal policy convergence. Public Finance Review, 35(3), 361-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142106295766
5. Dada, M. A. (2013). Composition effects of government expenditure on private consumption and output growth in Nigeria: A single-equation error correction modelling. Romanian Journal of Fiscal Policy (RJFP), 4(2), 18-34. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/107949