Affiliation:
1. Langlangbuana University, 40261, Padjadjaran University, Bandung Indonesia
2. Padjadaran University, Bandung, Indonesia
Abstract
This article highlights the dynamics of geothermal energy in the Kamojang nature reserve in Indonesia. A nature reserve is a conservation area that must be protected and preserved, because it has unique flora and fauna, and rare ecosystems whose existence is threatened with extinction. After going through a long study process by an integrated team, the government finally made a policy to change the function of the nature reserve into a Nature Tourism Park. Changes in policy changes to the function of nature reserves cause pros and cons in the community, and cause conflicts between government and environmental activists. The purpose of this study is to identify the factors that cause changes in the function of nature reserves into natural tourism parks in the Kamojang conservation area of Indonesia, as well as to identify appropriate communication models in the management of geothermal energy through communication and environmentally sustainable approaches. Research findings show that the factors that cause changes in the function of nature reserves into tourist parks include; the interests of geothermal energy to meet national energy needs and electricity infrastructure, accommodate the needs of surrounding communities that utilize water resources in conservation areas, and restore ecosystems. The communication model for geothermal energy management that we propose at the same time is also a novelty namely; ecopopulism approach, negotiation approach, collaboration, and equating meaning and orientation to environmental sustainability.
Type of Paper: Empirical
Keywords: Geothermal Energy, Nature Reserves, Conservation Policies, Communication Models and Sustainable Development.
Publisher
Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise
Reference49 articles.
1. Aas, C., Ladkin, A. and Fletcher, J., 2005. Stakeholder collaboration and heritage management. Annals of tourism research, 32(1), pp.28-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2004.04.005.
2. Barnlund, D. C. (2017). A transactional model of communication. In Communication theory (pp. 47-57). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315080918-5.
3. Brower, N. and Darrington, J., 2012. Effective communication skills: resolving conflicts. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1786&context=extension_curall.
4. Chan, K.M., Shaw, M.R., Cameron, D.R., Underwood, E.C. and Daily, G.C., 2006. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS biology, 4(11).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040379
5. Davis, L., Fähnrich, B., Nepote, A.C., Riedlinger, M. and Trench, B., 2018. Environmental communication and science communication—conversations, connections and collaborations. Environmental Communication, 12(4), pp.431-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1436082.