Affiliation:
1. Department of Accounting and Taxation, College of Business, University Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Abstract
Objective – The highly concentrated ownership structure, lack of quality information, and weak regulatory environments caused imbalances in the movement of cash flows and thereby put the liquidity levels of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) banks on a downward trend. This prompted policymakers in the GCC region to modify their Corporate Governance (C.G.) codes to boost the financial position of the GCC banking industry as liquidity providers and minimize systemic risk. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to conceptually investigate the relationship between board governance attributes and liquidity creation in the GCC banking sector.
Methodology – The methodology employed in this study is a review of prior research on bank governance mechanisms and liquidity creation to gather perspective and establish a prediction about the association between board attributes and liquidity creation in the GCC banking industry.
Findings – The study concludes that there is a positive correlation between the analyzed board governance features and the creation of liquidity based on several theories gleaned from a review of prior research.
Novelty – The study evaluates bank liquidity creation and how board attributes influence it.
Type of Paper: Review
JEL Classification: M41, M49.
Keywords: Liquidity Creation, Corporate Governance, Agency Theory, Board Attributes, GCC.
Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Mousa, A.K.A; Hassan, N.L; Pirzada, K. (2022). Board Governance Mechanisms and Liquidity Creation: A Theoretical Framework, J. Fin. Bank. Review, 7(2), 122 – 134. https://doi.org/10.35609/jfbr.2022.7.2(3)
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Publisher
Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise
Reference47 articles.
1. Abou-El-Sood, H. (2019). Corporate governance and risk-taking: the role of board gender diversity. Pacific Accounting Review, 31(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-03-2017-0021
2. Acharya, V., & Naqvi, H. (2012). The seeds of a crisis: A theory of bank liquidity and risk-taking over the business cycle. Journal of Financial Economics, 106(2), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.05.014
3. Al-Khouri, R., & Arouri, H. (2016). The simultaneous estimation of credit growth, valuation, and stability of the Gulf Cooperation Council banking industry. Economic Systems, 40(3), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2015.12.005
4. Al-Khouri, R., & Arouri, H. (2019). Market power and the role of banks as liquidity providers in GCC markets. Cogent Economics and Finance, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2019.1639878
5. Al-Magharem, A. A. S., Haat, M. H. C., Hashim, H. A., & Ismail, S. (2019). Corporate governance and loan loss provisions: A review. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 14(4), 228–241. https://jssm.umt.edu.my/wp-content/uploads/sites/51/2018/05/11_1-V15N3_.pdf
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献