Affiliation:
1. Doctoral School of Management and Business Administration, Szent Istvan University, Godollo 2100, Hungary
2. Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Szent Istvan University, Godollo 2100, Hungary
Abstract
Objective – This study examines consumer attitudes and reactions towards personalised pricing strategies in a negative and positive hypothetical purchase context.
Methodology/Technique – The data was collected from 250 respondents from India through a set of two structured questionnaires, each one comprising either a positive or negative purchase scenario. Partial Least Square based Structural Equation Modelling (PLS SEM) was used to analyse the data.
Findings – The results of the study imply that the consumers are concerned about the usage of their personal data for price customisation which reduces their repurchase intentions and increases the reprisal intention. The results also depict that a loyal customer base reacts positively to some extent to the personalised pricing strategy.
Novelty –This study considers the impact of personalised pricing on the fair price perceptions, privacy concerns and customer loyalty in both positive and negative purchase contexts which is a novel in this research area.
Type of Paper: Empirical.
Keywords: Personalised Pricing; E-Commerce; Consumer Behaviour; Price Discrimination, PLS SEM.
Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Victor, V.; Farkas, M. F.; Lakner, Z. 2019. Consumer Attitude and Reaction towards Personalised Pricing in the E-Commerce Sector, J. Mgt. Mkt. Review 4 (2): 140 – 148 https://doi.org/10.35609/jmmr.2019.4.2(6)
JEL Classification: D82, D90, D11
Publisher
Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise
Reference35 articles.
1. Akerlof, G. A. (1978). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. In Uncertainty in economics (pp. 235-251). Academic Press https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978012214850750022X
2. Ansari, A., Mela, C. F., & Neslin, S. A. (2008). Customer channel migration. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(1), 60-76 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1509/jmkr.45.1.060
3. Armstrong, M. (2006). Recent developments in the economics of price discrimination. Cambridge University Press http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/14558/
4. Ashworth, L. and Free, C. (2006). Marketing Dataveillance and Digital Privacy: Using Theories of Justice to Understand Consumers’ Online Privacy Concerns. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 107-123.
5. Brown, M., & Muchira, R. (2004). Investigating the relationship between Internet privacy concerns and online purchase behavior. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 5(1), 62-70 https://web.csulb.edu/journals/jecr/issues/20041/Paper6.pdf
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献