A Meta-Analysis of Instructional Management Model for Students’ Creative Thinking Development: An Application of Propensity Score Matching

Author:

Itsarangkul-Na-Ayutthaya TanapatORCID,Damrongpanit* SuntonrapotORCID

Abstract

<p style="text-align:justify">The research emphasized three main objectives: 1) to analyze the propensity score of the research effect size for developing students’ creative thinking, 2) to study the attribute variables effect of the research on the effect size of creative thinking before and after the propensity score adjustments, and 3) to compare the effect size between instructional methods to develop creative thinking before and after the propensity score adjustments. The data were obtained from 400 research studies on creative thinking development in Thailand. The research instrument for data collection included the research attribute record form. They were analyzed by calculating effect size, propensity score matching analysis, and fixed effect and random effect meta-regression analysis. The results indicated two research groups with propensity scores that develop students' creative thinking: the low effect size group of 256 research (<!--[if gte msEquation 12]><m:oMath><m:acc><m:accPr><m:chr m:val="̅"/><span style='font-size:9.0pt;mso-ansi-font-size:9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;mso-ascii-font-family: "Cambria Math";mso-hansi-font-family:"Cambria Math";font-style:italic; mso-bidi-font-style:normal'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:accPr><m:e><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language: EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA'><m:r><m:rPr><m:nor/></m:rPr>d</m:r></span></m:e></m:acc></m:oMath><![endif]--> =1.345) and the high effect size group of 144 research (<!--[if gte msEquation 12]><m:oMath><m:acc><m:accPr><m:chr m:val="̅"/><span style='font-size:9.0pt;mso-ansi-font-size:9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;mso-ascii-font-family: "Cambria Math";mso-hansi-font-family:"Cambria Math";font-style:italic; mso-bidi-font-style:normal'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:accPr><m:e><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language: EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA'><m:r><m:rPr><m:nor/></m:rPr>d</m:r></span></m:e></m:acc></m:oMath><![endif]--> =7.284) using 26 attribute variables of creative thinking development research. Moreover, the instructional methods with the creative activities had the highest effect size (<!--[if gte msEquation 12]><m:oMath><m:acc><m:accPr><m:chr m:val="̅"/><span style='font-size:9.0pt;mso-ansi-font-size:9.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:9.0pt; font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;mso-ascii-font-family:"Cambria Math"; mso-hansi-font-family:"Cambria Math";font-style:italic;mso-bidi-font-style: normal'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:accPr><m:e><span style='font-size: 9.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language: AR-SA'><m:r><m:rPr><m:nor/></m:rPr>d</m:r></span></m:e></m:acc></m:oMath><![endif]--> =3.88). After the analysis of propensity score matching, the effect of 12 research attribute variables was eliminated as follows: manufacturing research institutions, year of publication, educational institutions, curriculum, creative thinking indicators, instructional materials, types of research, research objectives, research groups, research protocols, statistics used in research, quality of research and it was found that integrated instructional model of knowledge using media and technology had the highest effect size (<!--[if gte msEquation 12]><m:oMath><m:acc><m:accPr><m:chr m:val="̅"/><span style='font-size:9.0pt;mso-ansi-font-size:9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;mso-ascii-font-family: "Cambria Math";mso-hansi-font-family:"Cambria Math";font-style:italic; mso-bidi-font-style:normal'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:accPr><m:e><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language: EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA'><m:r><m:rPr><m:nor/></m:rPr>d</m:r></span></m:e></m:acc></m:oMath><![endif]--> =0.41).</p>

Publisher

Eurasian Society of Educational Research

Subject

Education

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3