Affiliation:
1. Institute for Materials Research, University of Salford, Salford, U.K.
Abstract
Abstract
The Compound Energy Formalism was not developed by using standard statistical mechanical procedures. If it had been, the model would have been based on cluster solution members instead of on compound end members. In its present form, using the Bragg – Williams approximation, the distinction between these two types of entity has no impact on the model's application, with one notable exception – the case of vacancy properties in intermediate phases. The distinction between the two viewpoints becomes more significant, however, for the future development of the model. It is not clear how short range order or the effects of atomic size mismatch can be explicitly taken into account in its compound end member form. Both of these features are readily absorbed into the model, however, when cluster solution members are considered to be the important entities.
Subject
Materials Chemistry,Metals and Alloys,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Condensed Matter Physics
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献