Abstract
Abstract
Composite materials show an extraordinary change of properties depending on service life. This implies the necessity to find tailored methods to determine strength and residual strength of composite cylinders. This determination can be done by load cycle tests [1] or, in some cases, primarily by slow burst tests [2]. The results of both test methods need statistical assessment for the precise description of strength. Especially the statistical assessment of burst related strength properties has a high uncertainty. Sample size [3] and scatter distribution were identified as major influences on uncertainty. It is unclear if a Gaussian normal distribution, a Weibull distribution or others describe the scatter behaviour correctly. An assumption has to be found and confirmed to prevent overestimation of survival rate, respectively reliability, in the interval of one failure per 104 to 108 cylinders.
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,General Materials Science
Reference10 articles.
1. Technical annex LCT (load cycle test) of the concept additional tests CAT
2. Technical annex SBT (slow burst test) of the concept additional tests CAT
3. Einfluss der Stichprobengröße auf die Bewertung der Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeit von Druckgefäßen aus Verbundwerkstoffen,2014
4. Assessment of the residual strength thresholds of composite pressure receptacles – Criteria for hydraulic load cycle testing,2013
5. Statistic evaluation of sample test results to determine residual strength of composite gas cylinders,2013
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献