A comparison of different distributions of azimuth angles in the sin2 ψ-method-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A comparison of different distributions of azimuth angles in the sin2 ψ-method

Published:2007-02-01 Issue:2 Volume:98 Page:87-90
ISSN:2195-8556
Container-title:International Journal of Materials Research
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Ortner Balder¹

Affiliation:

1. Erich Schmid Institute of Materials Science, Austrian Academy of Sciences and Institute of Material Physics, University Leoben, Leoben, Austria

Abstract

Abstract X-ray stress measurement in a specimen with a biaxial stress state is usually done with the -method, where measurements are carried out at different and. For the values the most usual choice is 0°, 45°, 90°. A better choice would be. The reason why is explained in detail by comparing the error calculus for these two cases.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Materials Chemistry,Metals and Alloys,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Condensed Matter Physics

Link

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.3139/146.101445/pdf

Reference11 articles.

1. Generalised Least-squares Determination of Triaxial Stress States by X-ray Diffraction and the Associated Errors

2. Lower bounds for the determinant and the trace of a class of Hermitian matrices

3. How to choose sample orientations in full strain/stress tensor determination with a time-of-flight goniometer

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. About Error Calculation in X-Ray Stress Measurement;Advanced Materials Research;2014-08

2. Why we should give up the sin2ψ method;Powder Diffraction;2009-06

3. Are data correctly fitted by the sin2 ψ and similar methods?;International Journal of Materials Research;2008-09-01